Search results

Was a Lad. 7 first due box, when has it changed?

This is been going on for like 2 weeks or more almost every night, you would think something should have been done by now to rectify the situation instead of having units 10-5 transmissions over & over

Likely a 6th Division box had they transmitted 2889 originally

132 was first due today, 122 fast

Not with BARB

Box 2999 the earlier 3rd alarm, total different area as box 2990

This site has a dedicated history section for any incidents that are not current https://www.nycfire.net/forums/forums/incidents.72/

Eng. 309 was relocated somewhere I would think Eng. 276 is on the box (before Eng. 281)

Eng. 309 not on the box

Same here, check date...

Check date

We don't know, please keep us updated with all this information as soon as you got it.

Not a dispatcher. from what I'm aware, Deputies respond on confirmed 10-75's or All Hands-Doubtful, they get a mark on every All Hands though, occasionally will respond to All Hands-Under Control

Without posting time stamps on incidents how should anyone know

79/37 first due, followed by 62/32

After Bn. 2 asked for the 10-76, Div. 1 told dispatch "instead of the 10-76, make it a 10-75 & give me a 2nd Alarm" perhaps the dispatcher didn't copy that transmission or proceeded with the 10-76 per protocol ?

1 month behind...

Guessing that this came as a result of the Staten Island 4 Alarm fire where the members were injured in a wind impacted fire. It basically gives the responding companies a heads up to use extra caution while operating under windy conditions. Sometimes you might not feel a steady wind but it...

Only explanation I could think of is that the other closer chiefs were possibly A.B.C. and not qualified to be designated as the "Safety Officer"

Passed the area on the J train around 13:00, stopped by to snap a photo