CFDMarshal said:Bulldog said:Do you have any evidence to support your position? Until an investigation is completed anything is just speculation! With layers and material like this rekindles are extremely likely because the fire can appear to be out but deep down inside of the material there is enough heat to flare back up later.1261Truckie said:On another site it was reported that the building was sprinklered and they contained the first job. Whoever wanted this building out of the way knew the sprinklers would be out of service and relit it after the companies left the scene. That fire was no rekindle.
Most places require that a fire watch be implemented if the sprinkler system is left 00S, is this the case in NYC?
We can go the speculation route and you are correct Bulldog, an investigation will hopefully vet out the truth, but if we are sitting around the firehouse table or at the local bar discussing this fire. I am with 1261 Truckie on this one! JUst one man's humble opinion!
Does R-2 mean Rescue 2 or something else? ???Signal73 said:Relief Companies @18:00
E-97,217,220,231,238,292
L-85,111,161,103Fast
B-14,35,41,50
R-2
That's the guy who called me on the phone to ask what RS-2 was because he could hear R-2 was still in quarters.Signal73 said:Rescue Company Number 2 G-Man . Some one thinks its "Rescue Support 2" like a ReBreather unit