4-14--2020 ...STATEN ISLAND AH BOX 3455.

Joined
May 6, 2010
Messages
17,924
0251 hrs Box loaded up reported people trapped....0254 hrs 10-75 for a Fire in a 4 sty light weight wood truss & gusset plate condo at 310 Timber Ridge Drive...0259 hrs two 10-45s no code. ....  https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&channel=mac_bm&source=hp&ei=SGeVXqHqDvyKytMPlOaSuAY&q=310+TIMBERIDGE+DRIVE+SI+NY&oq=310+TIMBERIDGE+DRIVE+SI+NY&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQAzIFCCEQqwI6AggAOgUIABCDAToOCAAQ6gIQtAIQmgEQ5QI6BAgAEAM6AggmOgYIABAWEB46BAgAEA06BggAEA0QHjoICCEQFhAdEB46BQghEKABSiwIFxIoMjMwZzc5ZzkxZzU0ZzUyZzI1MGc2M2c1MGc2OGc1N2c2M2c2OGc3OUodCBgSGTFnMmcxZzFnMWcxZzFnMWcxZzFnNWc1ZzdQgxFY7qgBYIWwAWgAcAB4AIAB9AGIAckQkgEGMjUuMS4ymAEAoAEBqgEHZ3dzLXdperABBg&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwihrti5s-foAhV8hXIEHRSzBGcQ4dUDCAw&uact=5
 
Timber Ridge Drive off the Cul-de-sac

SI to E162, L082, and BC23: Reports of someone trapped in the house. E165 became available and replaced E163.

SI to E164: responding?

E164: 10-4

SI to BC23: Another call for someone trapped

Probably:  E162, E165, E167, E164
                L082, T085, T087F, L084s/c
                RS05, SQ08
                BC. 23, 21
                Div. 8
                E159T SAT5

Picture of condo building:




Pics from citizen: nice placement of TL85 ?Monster Truck?, backing onto the grass and putting the bucket up. This development, like many of the lightweight constructions on SI, is very tight to maneuver.







 
One of the victims dies from injuries. See Advance link below.

https://www.silive.com/news/2020/04/cops-woman-36-dies-after-house-fire-in-bay-terrace.html
 
https://www.silive.com/news/2020/04/mother-becomes-second-family-member-to-die-of-injuries-from-bay-terrace-house-fire-source-says.html

Second 10-45 succumbed to her injuries from this fire. Double fatal. Still no word on a cause.
 
What I don't understand about this fire is the time discrepancy. The people interviewed by the Advance indicate that the fire began at 2:30 am. According the the first post the 10-75 was transmitted at 2:54 am. Is it me or does this seem like a big time gap ? Perhaps there was a delay in calling the FD.
 
jlab said:
What I don't understand about this fire is the time discrepancy. The people interviewed by the Advance indicate that the fire began at 2:30 am. According the the first post the 10-75 was transmitted at 2:54 am. Is it me or does this seem like a big time gap ? Perhaps there was a delay in calling the FD.
The article says the fire started at 2:48AM, not sure how accurate the reporting is but that makes more sense being the 10-75 was transmitted 6 minutes later at 2:54AM. Its a possibly that the neighbors interviewed who said 2:30 were wrong.
 
FDNYSTATENISLAND said:
jlab said:
What I don't understand about this fire is the time discrepancy. The people interviewed by the Advance indicate that the fire began at 2:30 am. According the the first post the 10-75 was transmitted at 2:54 am. Is it me or does this seem like a big time gap ? Perhaps there was a delay in calling the FD.
The article says the fire started at 2:48AM, not sure how accurate the reporting is but that makes more sense being the 10-75 was transmitted 6 minutes later at 2:54AM. Its a possibly that the neighbors interviewed who said 2:30 were wrong.
2:30 is close enough. Person probably (erroneously) rounded down. Probably so much mayhem in those first few minutes that by the time he looked at a clock he thought much more time had passed. That house woulda been fully involved otherwise.
 
Back
Top