The judge went on to say "At least one witness for the firefighters- the retired Hartford deputy chief-insisted there was not a moment to lose. He refused to acknowledge that a lower risk of fires means lower risk to firefighters. To him firefighters who respond to 1 major fire a year have just as much a chance of being hurt as those who respond to a 100 major fires a year. This is like saying a man playing Russian Roulette faces greater risk by pulling the trigger 5 times does by pulling it once. Besides violating high school math lessons about permutations, this approach defies common sense. It is not a sound basis for judicial decision making". (referring to the request of the Union for an emergency injunction preventing the layoffs). Unbelievable !!!