- Joined
- May 6, 2010
- Messages
- 15,710
Mon., Mar. 12, 2012
FDNY pulls ?fast? one with stats
By JOSH MARGOLIN
The Bloomberg administration is intentionally omitting key information from Fire Department data while boasting ?record low? response times ? even as firetrucks take up to two extra minutes to reach blazes, according to recent explosive testimony.
The revelation came from none other than the FDNY?s top communications official during a labor-dispute hearing.
?We don?t record the time from when the police [911] call taker makes contact with the caller until it gets to the fire[-dispatch system],? Fire Department communications chief Robert Boyce said in sworn testimony Jan. 19.
Under the old system, 911 police dispatchers took initial fire calls and then quickly, typically within four seconds, passed them to fire dispatchers, sources said. The fire dispatchers then did a lengthier interview with the caller, up to two minutes, before sending out a truck, the sources said.
The length of the initial 911 call had not been included in response times, but the longer fire-dispatch call was.
Then, in 2008, the system changed. Police dispatchers began handling the entire interview process ? and the time it takes hasn?t been included in department response data since.
Given the change, ?there?s no way for the city to determine whether or not the city of New York is responding to fires faster than they were,? Joshua Zuckerberg, a lawyer for the fire officers? union, told Boyce, according to transcripts from an arbitration dispute between the union and the Fire Department.
Boyce acknowledged, ?I think that?s fair to say.?
Brian Kuntz, president of the fire dispatchers? union, told The Post that ?the numbers are definitely skewed because they?re deleting the whole interrogation and they?re saying, ?We?re doing it better.?
?If you included those interrogations in the calls, they?d be a minute, at least, more than they?re telling you.?
FDNY spokesman Frank Gribbon, when asked about the issue, insisted, ?It?s clear from the results from the last two years that our response times are the fastest ever . . . Fire deaths are at the lowest on record.?
jmargolin@nypost.com
NEW YORK POST is a registered trademark of NYP Holdings, Inc.
nypost.com , nypostonline.com , and newyorkpost.com are trademarks of NYP Holdings, Inc.
Copyright 2011 NYP Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy | Terms of Use
...
Oddly enough the day before the post story above concerning FDNY response times this story about the Los Angeles FD was posted on the Chicago PD rant ......QUOTE......Sunday, March 11, 2012
Speaking of Fake Response Times...
Look what just broke over in L.A:
A Los Angeles mayoral candidate took an early campaign swipe at his leading opponents this week and inadvertently exposed the city Fire Department for publishing misleading performance data.
Top brass at the Los Angeles Fire Department on Friday admitted that for years the agency put out data that made it appear that firefighters were arriving at the scene of emergencies faster than they actually were.
Relying on Fire Department reports presented to lawmakers, Beutner said that in 2008 the department responded to medical emergencies within five minutes 86% of the time. After the cuts, the department last year met that standard just 59% of the time, he said.
Following Beutner's critique � and a Times inquiry � the department made an awkward admission: Data showing it did so well in the past was simply wrong.
Whoa. So they actually....like....lied? A government agency? But that could never happen here, right? The most corrupt state in the USA? Never!
UNQUOTE.......link to Chicago PD site that had story about LAFD response times.... http://www.secondcitycop.blogspot.com/
FDNY pulls ?fast? one with stats
By JOSH MARGOLIN
The Bloomberg administration is intentionally omitting key information from Fire Department data while boasting ?record low? response times ? even as firetrucks take up to two extra minutes to reach blazes, according to recent explosive testimony.
The revelation came from none other than the FDNY?s top communications official during a labor-dispute hearing.
?We don?t record the time from when the police [911] call taker makes contact with the caller until it gets to the fire[-dispatch system],? Fire Department communications chief Robert Boyce said in sworn testimony Jan. 19.
Under the old system, 911 police dispatchers took initial fire calls and then quickly, typically within four seconds, passed them to fire dispatchers, sources said. The fire dispatchers then did a lengthier interview with the caller, up to two minutes, before sending out a truck, the sources said.
The length of the initial 911 call had not been included in response times, but the longer fire-dispatch call was.
Then, in 2008, the system changed. Police dispatchers began handling the entire interview process ? and the time it takes hasn?t been included in department response data since.
Given the change, ?there?s no way for the city to determine whether or not the city of New York is responding to fires faster than they were,? Joshua Zuckerberg, a lawyer for the fire officers? union, told Boyce, according to transcripts from an arbitration dispute between the union and the Fire Department.
Boyce acknowledged, ?I think that?s fair to say.?
Brian Kuntz, president of the fire dispatchers? union, told The Post that ?the numbers are definitely skewed because they?re deleting the whole interrogation and they?re saying, ?We?re doing it better.?
?If you included those interrogations in the calls, they?d be a minute, at least, more than they?re telling you.?
FDNY spokesman Frank Gribbon, when asked about the issue, insisted, ?It?s clear from the results from the last two years that our response times are the fastest ever . . . Fire deaths are at the lowest on record.?
jmargolin@nypost.com
NEW YORK POST is a registered trademark of NYP Holdings, Inc.
nypost.com , nypostonline.com , and newyorkpost.com are trademarks of NYP Holdings, Inc.
Copyright 2011 NYP Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy | Terms of Use
...
Oddly enough the day before the post story above concerning FDNY response times this story about the Los Angeles FD was posted on the Chicago PD rant ......QUOTE......Sunday, March 11, 2012
Speaking of Fake Response Times...
Look what just broke over in L.A:
A Los Angeles mayoral candidate took an early campaign swipe at his leading opponents this week and inadvertently exposed the city Fire Department for publishing misleading performance data.
Top brass at the Los Angeles Fire Department on Friday admitted that for years the agency put out data that made it appear that firefighters were arriving at the scene of emergencies faster than they actually were.
Relying on Fire Department reports presented to lawmakers, Beutner said that in 2008 the department responded to medical emergencies within five minutes 86% of the time. After the cuts, the department last year met that standard just 59% of the time, he said.
Following Beutner's critique � and a Times inquiry � the department made an awkward admission: Data showing it did so well in the past was simply wrong.
Whoa. So they actually....like....lied? A government agency? But that could never happen here, right? The most corrupt state in the USA? Never!
UNQUOTE.......link to Chicago PD site that had story about LAFD response times.... http://www.secondcitycop.blogspot.com/