My question about unions and OT still stands. My question is why would a union care if FDNY is called for mutual aid RATHER then a further away company that is not mutual aid. I am not saying instead of calling in the OT guys. I am saying call the closer dept for mutual aid rather then a farther away one. If mutual aid is being called then the union shouldn't really have any opinion on where it comes from.
Yes I said closest units, and you raise a good point about calling across the border companies that are closer then a company from the "home" department. I feel like that is a caveat to the argument. If it is the same department that has some validity. If calling mutual aid the preference should be given to the closest depts. The chiefs in Nassau, and Westchester, and Jersey should also know that asking for one piece of apparatus doesn't work, they should know the fdny policy about if you ask for one you get "this"
One of the biggest questions in the NTSB inquiry into the LODD deaths in Newark on the ship was why it took so long to call the FDNY, and there was no good answer given that I heard.
I completely understand MV calling New Rochelle or Yonkers for help first, there is merit to calling the depts that have radio capabilities and similar SOP and all that. But when it starts getting farther and farther away like this incident calling the FDNY should be earlier on the list.
That's my opinion. I am not FDNY, or even close to NYC and honestly the region I do live in needs to be better at mutual aid, I understand "there is more to it" but that should be ironed out when its not "go time" through meetings with chiefs and admins.