Engine 165 to Squad 165

dan said:
New rig was at radio shops last week. It is supposedly only a 1000 gpm pump. As has been mentioned previously 165 has additional collateral assignments that 44, 250 and 274 do not have. They are a water rescue unit and also carry a chain saw or 2 and are supposed to have a zodiac boat. The other HMTU Engines have raised cab Seagraves while 165 still has a much older Seagrave with less storage then the other HMTU's. The rig should be in service pretty quick since only 165 has to be trained on it. May do it right in quarters. Hope this clears up some of the speculation.
That actually further confuses the issue because I believe all the other HMTU engines have a larger pumps that the engine companies have some of the smaller pump that the squads have.  It certainly seems like they had too many hats in their repertoire!
 
Curious as to the resistance in making 165 a Squad.  From all accounts, the Company appears to almost have all the same capabilities.  I am sure there is additional technical rescue training they would need, but with the talk of a Squad needed on SI, it appears this would be a worthwhile investment. I can see with the limited Engine Companies on SI, if 165 was made a Squad, then an additional new Engine Company should be placed in service.
 
flt, you hit the nail on the head when you said it would require creating another engine company!  I'm sure the powers that be like to have a squad on SI but they don't want to face the political heat they would have to encounter to add an engine company to SI or anyplace else for that matter!
 
When will sq. 165 be n service? It wont its staying an Engine

Other than the 8 sq. and 8 hp. how many 2013 2014 seagrave pumps are there? not sure

How many 2014 kme are in service? I think there are 3 in service 97, 251 & ?? and 71 is in the (Radio Shops)
 
If an engine company on SI became a squad, why would you need to create another engine company, too?  The engine which became a squad would still respond 1st due as an engine where they are located.

 
There would be no need to add a engine company if E 165 became a squad .. As Mack stated,  1st, 2nd  and 3 rd due they would be a engine..  If they respond as a squad to any 10-75 or for whatever reason, a re-locator could simply  cover 165's area just as the job does now when they are assigned Haz Mat calls outside their response area...Remember for obvious reasons, though needed, a squad on the Island would not be as busy as the others
 
On a recent mini Get Together this past July in Virginia, we were told by site member "flapara13", Steve E., that as a battalion chief in the Albermarie County Fire Department, some of his runs required a distance of 25 miles. I'm sure a "10-12" is requested, if not required for that kind of run. So what I had told him was that I had never heard of any fire department units making that long of a run for a first alarm.

  Well, as most of us know, and from our Get Together of last year, the FDNY does have a unit that may sometimes respond that long of a distance. Not on the initial call but may respond on certain request or at the transmission of a working fire. As we learned, Squad 1 from Brooklyn will sometimes make a response to the far end of Staten Island putting that mileage on the rig.

  As reported earlier, except for some extra cost for training, equipment and SOC members, it seems to me the extra benefits versus the cost, to make E 165 into S 165 would have certainly made sense to do. I guess money needs to be spent elsewhere. I guess there's always a few surprises that pop up. One such surprise that I heard will be a mass protest march across the VZ Bridge later this month. I'm sure a police mobilization and FDNY EMS presence will be required.  I'm sure the cost for that one day event would support the cost of a new Squad 165.
 
  Some other places that I know of where Squad Companies have worked and are in addition to Rescues are: Jersey City and Camden, NJ., Yonkers, NY. and Philadelphia, Pa. and I believe Baltimore. Cities with Squads only and no Heavy Rescue are Bridgeport and New Haven, Ct (2 for New Haven). However, those of Ct do not have regular first alarm response districts to cover. Even in the small city where I worked, our Squad was used as an Engine/Rescue Company, with its own first alarm engine company duties.

  For many of these Squads, the concept came from the idea of the FDNY to use an engine company, not only for regular first alarm assignment, but added manpower for working fires and also for Rescue and Haz Mat duties. They seem to be performing their double duty quite well. And by combining the services of a well trained group of members for Engine and Truck company operations, many with their own added duties who receive additional training, makes it all worthwhile to the people who depend on the fire department. Add in the numerous life saving EMS runs in conjunction with the FDNY/EMS, and it's what could be seen as "The Total Package Deal". The earlier Squad Companies were closed down in the mid 70s, just as their services were even more required, due to very heavy fire activity.

  I am not a citizen or taxpayer of NYC. But would making Engine 165 into Squad 165 with it's additional duties been worth it ? I think so.  A 25 mile response for any FDNY company or a Battalion Chief of any county in Virginia, or elsewhere, is a pretty long ride when people are waiting for them to arrive. 
 
How about when squad 1 is on another run and they need a squad out there !  I gotta say it has to be political, they are already receiving the extra pay increase because there a hazmat company, with the way they buy Equiptment lately, what's another set of jaws, airbags and some ropes etc. not much compared to some recent spending, he'll they probaly have the stuff at one of the Equiptment depots. If they are worried that making it a squad will cost SI a unit because 165 might be responding to Brooklyn etc on 10-75's, then set protocol so 165 does not leave the island for anything less than a 10-60 or dosen't leave at all without borough chief approval. They know they need one, every time a major storm is coming and reserve units are activated, they almost always put squad 800 in service on the island. Bottom line I think if it was going to happen it would have happened now when they got the new rig, maybe something will change but I don't see it happening
 
Can any of our Sr. members remember back when Rescue 5 start responding off the island to parts of Bklyn was there any strong talk of putting a Squad in Service on the island back then for SOC cover??

You also get times when Rescue 5 is called into Manh as cover if R1 & R3 have a Water Incident leaving SI with no SOC cover

or the Train Derailment back in Dec '13 when you had 3 of the 5 Rescues in Da Bronx and all Squads nearly at one stage (Sq 252 even breaking down)

 
One of the arguments that's been made here regarding upgrading engine 165 to a squad is that it would increase the pay for the members.  Is that really true?  Don't they already receive the supplement because of their other certifications for hazmat etc.?  If that's the case I see actually no reason why they wouldn't make them a squad.
 
Irish -

There was no talk in 1984 to also form a squad in SI when Rescue 5 was reorganized at Engine 160.  Squads had been primarily manpower units and were not needed on SI.  The FDNY squad development, first as enhanced engines and then as special operations squad units took place much later - into the 1990s.

Rescue 5 was originally organized in 1948 at Engine 155 and Ladder 78.  Ladder 78 dual staffed the truck and the rescue.  They were assigned an officer and 7 or 8 FFs.  If they responded to an alarm as a truck, a FF stayed back to drive the rescue if a subsequent alarm required the response of Rescue 5.  Another truck was called to replace Ladder 78, the rescue driver responded to the original fire, picked up Ladder 78's members, and they responded to the new alarm as Rescue 5.  The chief was responsible for returning Ladder 78's rig.  They used a converted WLF hose wagon and had clip-on blue Rescue 5 front pieces for their helmets.  They stayed on SI, which was accessible only by ferry from Manhattan or Brooklyn.  Ladder 78 never responded out of their first due district to maintain Rescue 5 availability.

After the VN Bridge to Brooklyn opened, Rescue 5 was discontinued in 1962 and SI was left to be covered by Rescue 2 located at Engine 210.  This proved to be very difficult because of distance (25 mile responses), the rapid growth of SI, traffic, and the War Years.  Rescue 2 was assigned to SI fires, 3 alarms or greater, when available, in the 1960s and 1970s.  Thus, SI had limited rescue coverage, but FDNY was struggling to handle the tremendous fire response demands of the War Years while the city suffered fiscal crisis and layoffs.

In 1984, Rescue 5 was reorganized at Engine 160, much closer to Brooklyn via the VN Bridge.  It only made sense that Rescue 5 and the 8th Division pick up response into the 42nd and 43rd Battalions in Brooklyn because they were closer, because of Computer Assist Dispatch ability, because of greater reliance on the VN Bridge, and because of continual budget constraints.  I believe by the early 1990s, their response areas expanded across into Brooklyn's Bay Ridge, Bensonhurst and Coney Island.

SI does not have a backup when Rescue 5 responds off the Island or if they operate at a SI major incident, unless another rescue or squad relocate.  That is an advantage of assigning Squad 1 to SI 10-75s.  They are responding to SI and are available to be re-routed to another SI incident while Rescue 5 is operating. 

 
 
In somewhat related news, not-squad 165's housemate, Tower Ladder 85 took delivery a few days ago of their brand new 95 foot 'scope, replacing the 75 footer that will now be going to Tower Ladder 79. Better pics to follow.

 
I like it.  They should letter 165  that way each side above the cabinets  "NOT SQUAD 165" 
 
Nasibova said:
I like it.  They should letter 165  that way each side above the cabinets  "NOT SQUAD 165" 
The company's motto should be: "We are not a squad." That should put the confusion and debate to rest.
 
From NFPA Standards - Assessing Community Vulnerability.

This may add to this interesting thread of discussion. I am not that familiar with SI and have no dog in this fight. Curious as to how these standards line up with current situation in SI. Page 4- 8 lays out definitions of different hazard areas and recommended FD response assignments.
If link below doesn't open just Google "NFPA Fire Service Deployment - Assessing Community Vulnetability"

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&ei=HT3qU5izKsb9yQSFpIGYCg&url=http://www.nfpa.org/~/media/files/member%2520access/member%2520sections/metro%2520chiefs/urbanfirevulnerability.pdf&cd=1&ved=0CBwQFjAA&usg=AFQjCNHTApAz-_s70NNPDtjW7iyVCsPKOw&sig2=7G9CafH0L5jVgc0CbIgwhA
 
Back
Top